Freelancer Community Network
Reminder: Internet Explorer 6 or below are NOT supported.
HomeHome
ForumForum
WikiWiki
DownloadsDownloads
ForgeForge
Multiplayer Connection Tutorial
Collapse/Expand Random Image
Liberty Heavy Fighter reaches minefield
Collapse/Expand Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
Collapse/Expand Main Menu
Collapse/Expand Forum
Collapse/Expand Chat
Collapse/Expand Who's Online
45 user(s) are online (31 user(s) are browsing Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 45

more...
Collapse/Expand Donations
Monthly costs: -30€
Income (ads): +5€
Donations (last month): +5€

Current balance: 0€
(last updated 06/2020)

Please make a donation if you want to help keeping The-Starport online:

Bitcoin address:
Thanks!
Collapse/Expand Links
Collapse/Expand Advertisement
There are currently 30 users playing Freelancer on 42 servers.
 July. 8, 2020
The Starport Forum Index > All Posts (Ruppetthemuppet)

Bottom Bottom   Previous Topic   Next Topic

(1) 2 3 4 ... 10 »


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Crash Offsets
#1
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
One to add from Laz's crash hopper:

Code:

0E99458F ((module-name not available)): (filename not available): IDLL::operator=

    Unhandled Exception!
    -- Important Information --

    Source: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Games\Freelancer\dlls\bin\Content.dll
    RelExpAddr: 0x526961
    ExpCode: 0x3221225477
    ExpFlags: 0
    ExpAddress: 0x0E99458F
    Please report!


Patrol encounter contains a faction that is not defined in the related base's [BaseFaction] entries.

Posted on: 4/12 15:49
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: The big .thn/.lua research thread
#2
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
Found a fix! Jeider on the Freelancer Discord provided some alternate keyframes for manufacturing_platform_lod.cmp and that fixed the issue.

For anyone running into a similar problem in the future, they can be found below:

Code:

0
0
2
2
4
4
6
0


https://media.discordapp.net/attachmen ... 5622124101762/unknown.png

Posted on: 3/26 13:45
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Community Revival: Any Interest?
#3
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
@w0dk4 Thanks! We've been getting a steady influx of people since we started the Discord and having the link on the sidebar should definitely help keep that up!

Regarding GOG, Freelancer isn't on there, but it's in the top ten list of all requested games. Voting it up a bit more can't hurt!

Posted on: 3/24 20:15
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: The big .thn/.lua research thread
#4
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
I assume event_flags=2 is restart. I've played around with it and have seen the animation reverse and play once, but it won't loop smoothly.

You can see the behavior demonstrated here (Around 00:26):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtYnk2kJwTk

Posted on: 3/24 10:34
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: The big .thn/.lua research thread
#5
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
So, I'm having a very minor issue with my START_MOTION entry:

Code:
{
0,
START_MOTION,
{
"lpi_sugarland_mplatform_1"
},
{
animation="Sc_rotate living quarters",
duration=3600,
time_scale=1,
weight=1,
heading=-1,
event_flags=2
}
},


The animation (the rotating part for manufacturing_platform_lod.cmp ) 'jumps' inconsistently every now and then. As it's just a simple rotating part, and it loops for the entire duration of the scene, I'm not really sure what to do to get it fixed. This is the first time I've really played with START_MOTION in a scene. Any ideas?

Posted on: 3/24 8:53
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Major mods and JFLP
#6
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
I'm using JFLP as the basis for my mod, however, I know many of the larger mods (thinking Discovery here) prefer a pure vanilla install.

Discovery in particular will check the files it's installing over and will refuse to extract if you have anything more than a fresh vanilla installation. (i.e. if jflp.dll is installed it'll fail)

Posted on: 3/22 13:21
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Major mods and JFLP
#7
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
I'm using JFLP as the basis for my mod, however, I know many of the larger mods (thinking Discovery here) prefer a pure vanilla install.

Discovery in particular will check the files it's installing over and will refuse to extract if you have anything more than a fresh vanilla installation. (i.e. if jflp.dll is installed it'll fail)

Posted on: 3/22 13:21
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Change of Email address
#8
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
Sent you a DM

Posted on: 3/15 10:29
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Change of Email address
#9
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
I have a similar issue, the email I used for the starport is now unfortunately, defunct. Would it be possible to get permissions to adjust it? I'd quite like to get dm and thread reply notifications

Posted on: 3/14 14:31
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: The big .thn/.lua research thread
#10
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
@Treewyrm Bit late but I'm finally requesting edit access. I've started doing menu screens again and figured it would be good to note down what I figure out/remember as I go. I have a few bits on sparam ready to go already, so I'll add those when you approve it.

Posted on: 3/8 17:25
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Extra lines in dynamic infocards (Reverse-engineering jflp.dll/plugins)
#11
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
It's fine! It's not the biggest of issues anyway. All the Windows 7 users are missing out on (for now) is the shield stat lines, and we're listing those out of the game as well.

I've had a chat with the guy I've been working through this with, and we were both wondering if there was any documentation out there for us to learn from? We don't want to bother you every time with this stuff. We knew that our error from before had to do with the order in which we called things, but that was where our own insight ended.

My (very limited) understanding of how the plugins work is that they modify specific addresses in common.dll (or another dll) and then execute the code defined further down, but I have absolutely no idea what's instructing jflp to look into common.dll or even at the addresses it does.

Posted on: 3/4 14:16
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Extra lines in dynamic infocards (Reverse-engineering jflp.dll/plugins)
#12
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
Both dlls attached! The one that works on 7 is just the unmodified jflp.dll from your website.

Attach file:

zip jflp.zip Size: 72.76 KB; Hits: 24

Posted on: 3/4 6:14
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Extra lines in dynamic infocards (Reverse-engineering jflp.dll/plugins)
#13
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
I tried removing /MD (VC2019 defaults to /MT) and got a 110kb(!) DLL. It runs fine in 10, but seems to have the same issue on Windows 7 machines as before. Do you know if there's a way to see where it's failing/get some spew output about why it couldn't be loaded?

Posted on: 3/3 18:32
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Extra lines in dynamic infocards (Reverse-engineering jflp.dll/plugins)
#14
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
Opened up common.dll in IDA and I can sort of see what you mean! I've found the order of things you referenced, and I can see entries relating to AttachedEquipment ahead of ShieldGenerator at Archetype:: ShieldGenerator::read. This is all way over my head though. I think I have quite a lot of reading to do before I can get my head around playing with this more. Thankyou again for all your help

One odd thing: The newly compiled jflp.dll doesn't run in Windows 7. Freelancer fails to call it. I can only assume this is related to the change

Code:
*len += vswprintf( buf + *len, 4096 - *len, value_fmt, args );


on line 319 you suggested to get it compiling in VS 2019. There's no spew output other than dacom failing to load the dll and ignoring it. It's not a big problem though, Win7 users (The few we have) can happily go back to the standard 1.23 dll without any issues.

Posted on: 3/3 8:43
Top
Topic | Forum


Ruppetthemuppet
Re: Extra lines in dynamic infocards (Reverse-engineering jflp.dll/plugins)
#15
Quite a regular
Joined:
2008/2/14 21:37
From İstanbul, Turkey
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 138
Offline
This worked absolutely wonderfully, thank you so much!

Open in new window

May I ask what you're using to peek inside common.dll in such a manner? I have investigated it with a hex editor, but it's a bit overwhelming and very difficult to find anything coherent.

Posted on: 2/28 8:39
Top
Topic | Forum



Top Top
(1) 2 3 4 ... 10 »



[Advanced Search]