Already have sent a PM to M0tah (I must have oversaw this thread ^^), although you aren't going to introduce new features, you might want to integrated already existing ones.
Here are the PMs:
Bas


M0tah


Bas


It is just the point, if some features can be only added to FLHook by adding them directly in the programm (since nobody voluntarys to convert it into plugins), then this chance shall be used instead of not implenting those features.
My 2 Cents.

I don't know C++ yet (<- FLHook coder in spe....will learn C++ in my 2 next schoolyears....then I can develop for FLHook as well...hihi...), but isn't it easier to implent written/existing Features into FLHook with the main version instead of plugins?
I wasn't pointing into Flak 88 only, but aren't there many server which haven't moved to plugin because then they would lost their features (except they would convert them into plugins which might be more work instead of implenting them into FLHook directly?). Some Coders won't re-release their features as plugins due to the work needed to do that, but they may would give out the source code so that they could implented into the mian version?

Argh...I try in german, I suck in english ^^

Ist es nicht einfacher/ressourceneffektiver (im Sinne von Arbeit), bestehende Features (NICHT als Plugins) in das Hauptprogramm zu integrieren als diese als Plugins neu zu schreiben? Ich meine damit, dass einige Serveradmins/Coder ihre Features NICHT als Plugins neuschreiben werden noch die Pluginversion nutzen werden, da ihre Features mit dieser inkompatibel sind. Aber WENN ihre Features in der neuen FLHookversion enthalten sind, gäbe es für sie auch keinen Grund, nicht zur Plugin/neuen FLHookversion zu wechseln - Ihre Features funktionieren ja nun mit dieser. Nicht nur das FLHook durch deren Features erweitert werden würde, sie würden dann möglicherweise auch anfangen, Plugins zu schreiben. Es würde also im Prinzip der Community/dem Projekt als Ganzem helfen, oder nicht?
(Ist alles nur Theorie, ich weiß nicht, wie der Aufwand wirklich ist, wenn man es direkt in das Hauptprogramm integriert ^^)

Evtl. könnte man ja auch eine "Full" und eine "Light" Version des neuen FLHooks veröffentlichen, oder so.

My account: outcastatsabre@gmail.com

I've reorganized the rights a little, from now on only Motah and Cannon have comit-rights.

If you have a change you'd like to see in the plugin version, please do the changes on your local copy and then create a patch-file and post it in this thread, or make a new thread for it.
Thanks.

Could you please notify if you make any killer changes to the socket connection code - especially if you feel it would break compatability with Biocross and it's FLHook interactivity.

Other than that, any news on what changes/fixes to expect in the new version?

Encrypted socket connections sound interesting, might look into it when it is fully released

Everybody can checkout the latest build here:

http://code.google.com/p/flhookplugin/source/checkout